Entire nations can go insane. Here’s a way to test if we’re headed that way: Watch five minutes of TikTok—anything related to politics, beauty tips, or social justice. Follow that up with five minutes of MSNBC, then the same amount of Fox News. Next, read a chapter of Robin DiAngelo’s White Fragility—any chapter. Lastly, carefully scan some QAnon Reddit posts. Immediately after doing all this, take a shower and then ask yourself: Is American political culture not in the throes of degenerative madness? Might the seemingly stable present be attributable to the fact that we remain too rich, militarily impenetrable, and geographically insulated to face the full consequences of our psychological derangement?
I went to pick up a pizza yesterday, which we sometimes order from this place that’s about a ten-minute walk away.
As I was waiting to pick it up and pay for it, I was able to see how the pizza was made in the brick-lined wood-fired oven.
There was a very competent woman who was operating this one-person army of pizza making.
Taking the dough, rolling, then spinning it into that big flat shape. Then placing it on this big flat metal board with a long rod that was used to push it all the way in. And later taking it out; all this was happening extremely efficiently.
I had the sudden feeling like this is a person who is actually making something.
We have a lot of this glib talk about “makers” — but then frequently ignore people like this.
An obituary of Lorinda Cherry, someone I wouldn’t normally have heard about.
In these years, Cherry recalls, the potential of the computer had barely been tapped, and if asked what she did for a living, she would say that her job was to “see what kind of neat new things I can make the computer do, and in those days the computer wasn’t doing a lot, but it was super interesting and there was a lot more stuff you could make it do.”
Cherry found inspiration for her work in every area of her life, from rally car racing to dog training. In fact, she authored a series of papers on using statistical analysis to evaluate the unconscious bias of dog show judges toward certain characteristics or breeds. As she told one interviewer, “I’m a practitioner. I’m off to write programs with any excuse or activity.”
Today the term “cyberspace” sounds silly (perhaps “internet culture” comes closest) but here’s a 10-min clip of Neil Postman talking about it.
My first observation is his prescient (and today, contrarian) comments:
people becoming “information junkies“
globally connected world leading to a “reversion to tribalism” instead of bringing people together
people retreating away from public forums, and a reduced ability to solve problems together
“… am I using the technology, or is it using me?” (!)
My second observation is the format of this interview itself!
How rare it is now, to see a discussion like this, question-and-answer, uninterrupted every five minutes by an advertisement, without dramatic inflection.
Where could this even happen? Who would today’s equivalent of Charlayne Hunter Gault be? It certainly wouldn’t happen on TV! (The closest things come to this today are in “long-form podcasts”, like Joe Rogan or Lex Fridman)
What I found more interesting though was that article on the bottom-right.
This expresses sentiments that seem almost shocking today.
I don’t want to live in a world where science advances so rapidly that the man in the street doesn’t know what’s going on.
Think about that! It seems so quaint today, six decades on, when we take it for granted that people really have no clue about how things work.
And that’s not the only aspect that stood out:
But to me the most significant thing of this particular shot … is the fact that it takes men’s minds and eyes away from troubles and comparatively trivial problems, such as Laos and Cuba, and points out in the sky to what they are capable of doing.
Again, think about that! Dismissing domestic concerns as “comparatively trivial” would be pretty controversial today.
If it was possible to feel this sort of hope then, it must be possible to feel it again!
I had the following experience recently (hiding names and details because reasons):
I came across a repository implementing something that I found interesting, from a decade ago
The person had long abandoned this were now working at $BigCo at something completely unrelated
I made assumptions about who they were, what they must’ve been doing earlier
Turns out I couldn’t’ve been more wrong!
This person started off with a film and language background
This person worked for many years in various sorts of tech repair and maintenance
This person worked in IT support roles at small businesses
This person eventually joined some Bay Area company, and then joined $BigCo
The innovative exploratory repository that I had come across was something they did in their early period
This person found the time and motivation and interest to do this essentially on their own
I was impressed AF
I was embarrassed, firstly, to remember how frequently I’ve abandoned various lines of thinking or experimentation or making, with the excuse that “this is something that can happen after I do xyz“, or that “I need to learn xyz first, before trying this“
I was embarrassed, secondly, to realize how frequently I had made unconscious assumptions about “the paths that people take“, and what should or shouldn’t be possible at a certain point in time.